Last week, in a minute of grading-related frustration, I suggested on Twitter that tbelow is never before any excellent factor to usage the word “utilize”. As scientists, we love to usage it – and also I’ll have actually more to say about that listed below – yet my claim is that in every composing situation, “use” is a much better choice. It’s shorter, it’s simpler, it sounds much less pretentious.
You are watching: For the love of all that is holy meaning
I assumed this was a pretty trivial claim, so I was surprised to gain pushearlier. Maybe I’ll get some even more when I’ve posted this.
Why the pushback? Apparently, rather a couple of people* believe that use and utilize intend slightly different things. That’s not an implausible claim: the English language is full of almost-synonyms that carry valuable distinctions (think about run, dash, jog, and also lope). It’s not a correct case, though. Its incorrectness is evident from the fact that multiple civilization explained to me how the meaning of utilize differs from the definition of use – yet they largely disagreed through each other. Here are some of the claimed distinctions:Utilize means to use something in a novel or unintended means or for an improvised purpose, fairly than the commonly intended method or for the usually intfinished function.Utilize means to usage somepoint in a method that contributes to the original goal.Utilize suggests to make use of, which is different from using. (I’m not certain I understand this distinction.)Utilize suggests to use in a way that consumes what is used, or readjust it into somepoint else (as in nutrient utilization).Utilize implies to gain an outcome effectively; use doesn’t carry the “effective” connotation.Utilize suggests to offer a usage to something that was formerly usemuch less (this might share the improvisation idea with #1).Utilize is neutral, while use has actually an unfavorable connotation (as in “I feel used”).Utilize means to usage somepoint in a tactical or technological manner for advantage.
I’d never before heard any type of of these claims prior to (to me, use and also utilize are just synonyms.) The many renowned suggestion was #1, yet you may have noticed that #2 (the following many well-known, also argued by multiple people) is specifically oppowebsite. The others are somepoint of a grab bag. Finally, someone said consulting Fowler’s Modern English Usage. Great idea – Fowler’s is a gold mine for fine points of consumption favor this! But here’s the problem: 2 various editions of Fowler’s suggest two different meanings for utilize:
A. “to make great use of, specifically of something that was not intfinished for the objective, however will certainly serve” – A Dictionary of Modern English Usage, 2nd ed, 1965, revised by Sir Ernest Gowers
B. “to make useful usage of, to revolve to account” – Fowler’s Modern English Usage, third edition, 2004, revised by RW Burchfield
Meaning A is additionally popular interpretation #1 from the first list, which might sound prefer assistance – however even in 1965, Fowler’s listed that “this difference has disshowed up past recall”. There’s nopoint unusual around this. Tbelow are plenty of words that have ambiguous sets of connotations, frequently various for different audiences. Sometimes they’re ambiguous bereason they’re in the middle of a tempdental change: an interpretation is abandoned, or a brand-new definition dislocations an old one after a duration of semantic drift (favor “moot point” or “beg the question”, each of which has practically finimelted losing its original interpretation and obtaining a brand-new one). These ambiguous words are good words to avoid. (Incidentally, what makes some technical terminology helpful is that technological terms tfinish to have actually extremely precise interpretations that readjust more gradually, if at all – ghosting somebody didn’t mean the same thing 50 years back and most likely won’t intend the exact same thing 50 years from now; but 2-5-bis(4-methylbenzylidene)cyclopentanone did and also will certainly. This home is what renders some jargon good jargon.) If utilize did once have actually that connotation of use for an unintended purpose, it doesn’t any even more.
So where does this leave us? With a clear conclusion: you might think that utilize suggests one of the things on the list above – or perhaps, you may think it implies somepoint not yet caught by the list. But if you carry out, you’re wrong. A word doesn’t expect what a writer thinks it means; it suggests what readers think it suggests. And readers don’t, it seems, agree on what distinction tbelow is between use and utilize, or whether there’s any type of difference at all. As a writer, you can usage utilize intending to interact sense #1, or sense #2, or any kind of of senses #3 – #8; however you can’t depend on that communication prospering.
Now I’ll take one action more, and also here’s wbelow I’ll make myself unrenowned. I don’t really think utilize is widespread in our literary works bereason human being are trying to connect its expected connotations (although some might rationalize it that way after the fact). I think the real reason we usage utilize is bereason it sound science-y (and the easier use doesn’t). I think as undergraduate students and also early-career writers, we’re exposed to the literary works that’s gone prior to us, and also we watch turgid and also tedious prose bulging with long words and also complex frameworks – so that’s what we create. It’s no surpincrease that once I ask my undergraduate students to compose their outcomes “like a clinical paper”, they look to the literary works for examples and create what they’ve been reading. And right here we are, trapped in a circular expectation: we compose turgid and tedious pclimbed because we want to sound like the literary works, and also our literature sounds favor that bereason we store writing it that method. Utilize is one symptom of that extremely communicable and damaging condition trying-to-sound-science-y-itis. It’s really difficult to shake the disease: I even find myself using utilize (and using the passive voice, and also committing a legion of other sins) despite learning much better, because it’s so ingrained in my suffer. I try to modify them out, yet please don’t run a search of my publications to watch if I’ve been successful. I recognize what you’ll find. Leave me alone via my private regrets.
Bottom line: utilize doesn’t expect anything different from use; it just makes our literary works ponderous and pretentious. Let’s all sheight.
UPDATE: if this wasn’t sufficient for you, and also especially if you’re reasoning “But what around if…”, then see the followup post, “(Limited) use-cases for ‘utilize’“.
This article is based in part on material from The Scientist’s Guide to Writing, my handbook for scientific authors.
More of my Writing Pet Peeves: There’s no Such Thing as an Unconnected Genus, Statistics and Monumental Digits, Friends Don’t Let Friends Use “cf.”, and One Figure at a Time, Please.
See more: Why Was Ethiopia Able To Resist European Rule, Short Answer Questions Flashcards
*^I won’t determine right here the human being I’m disagreeing through, although I expect if you’re really curious you could sift with the replies to the original tweet.