Tim O’Brien’s novel Going After Cacciato (1978), which won the National Book Award, and his collection of stories The Things They Carried (1990), chosen by The New York Times editors as one of the finest books of 1990, have establiburned him as among the best fiction writers to check out...
You are watching: In the lake of the woods analysis
(The entire section contains 2392 words.)
Start your 48-hour cost-free trial to unlock this In the Lake of the Woods research guide. You"ll gain access to all of the In the Lake of the Woods content, as well as accessibility to even more than 30,000 additional guides and also even more than 350,000 Homejob-related Assistance concerns answered by our specialists.
Tim O’Brien’s novel Going After Cacciato (1978), which won the National Book Award, and his arsenal of stories The Things They Carried (1990), favored by The New York Times editors as one of the best publications of 1990, have established him as one of the best fiction authors to explore the Vietnam War and the emotional scars that left their marks on many combatants, consisting of O’Brien himself.
The main activity of Going After Cacciato is escape: The title character sindicate decides at some point to walk away from the battle, and his squad pursues him via the thick Vietnam jungles and also throughout Europe, all the method to Paris. The narrative is drenched in realistic detail, but it becomes progressively dreamfavor as the action moves amethod from the jungles.
The Things They Carried is likewise around escape, or, even more specifically, what cannot be escaped. In the autobiographical episode “On the Rainy River,” O’Brien describes, with painful honesty, why he reported for duty after being drafted instead of fleeing to Canada, as he wanted to perform. He visited Vietnam, he states, bereason he was a coward; because he was also weak to withstand the loss of love and respect that would have resulted from dodging the draft. Unlike a Cacciato, O’Brien himself can not walk ameans from military duty via a smile on his face; he might just imagine doing so. As he relates so vividly in the The Things They Carried, those who dealt with in Vietnam brought a heavy burden throughout and also after the war. While in combat they bore with them, in addition to the physical implements of battle, effective emotions: fear, grief, anger, and also guilt. After their tour of duty, the survivors left Vietnam, however Vietnam stayed in them; “They all brought ghosts.”
In the Lake of the Woods is also about ghosts, personal and nationwide, and about the imopportunity of escaping them. The central character, John Wade, has actually a lot in widespread with O’Brien himself: favor O’Brien, Wade flourished up in Minnesota; like O’Brien, he checked out Vietnam because he feared shedding the love of his family members and friends if he did not serve; like O’Brien, he did “poor things” in the battle in order to be loved and also respected by his comrades in arms; prefer O’Brien, he cannot escape the previous. Yet Wade is not O’Brien. Whereas O’Brien confronts his ghosts with the act of writing—exposing his guilt and also shame for public view—Wade is an expert at suppushing the previous and also at making all disagreeable memories disappear.
Disappearance is a significant motif in the novel. Wade, who is nickcalled Sorcerer, is an amateur magician. In his youth, his magic tricks helped him escape the pain resulted in by his alcoholic father’s verbal abuse and also eventual suicide (he hanged himself once Sorcerer was fourteen). Sorcerer learns at a very early age that magic is power: the power to deceive, trick, and manipulate others. In Vietnam, Sorcerer made entire villeras disappear through a couple of magic words and heavy explosives; after the My Lai slaughter—which O’Brien renders in vivid, gory detail—Wade provides his name disshow up from the agency roster. Back in the United States, he puts his magic and also trickery to usage as a politician; he is on the verge of winning a seat in the USA Senate as soon as the Vietnam past that he has buried deep inside his mind comes earlier to haunt him. The exploration and news reports of his participation in the My Lai incident expense him the election.
O’Brien reveals Wade’s haunted previous in bits and also pieces. The novel opens up in its current time frame (1986) with Wade and his wife, Kathy, trying to cope via the election defeat by secluding themselves at a cottage at the Lake of the Woods in the northern Minnesota wilderness. In love because college, as soon as John compulsively spied on her, they currently try to deceive themselves right into believing that they can forget the previous and also construct a new future out of the ashes of the defeat; yet solid tension and also tension run simply beneath the placid surconfront of their daily routines. Tright here have been as well many type of tricks and betrayals. The Lake of the Woods, with its “key channels and porteras and bays and also tangled woodlands,” therefore functions as a metaphor for the Wades’s mental state.
One morning Kathy vanishes from the cottage, without leaving a trace. Much of the subsequent narrative focuses on her disappearance: Did she acquire lost in the wilderness or accidentally drown? Did she commit suicide? Did she run out on Sorcerer? Perhaps Sorcerer made her disshow up, and also is currently concealing that destructive reality from himself. The stage is collection for a gripping mystery drama. This is not, but, a secret novel, at leastern not in the conventional sense, bereason O’Brien refoffers to resolve the mystery; tbelow is no climactic discovery or denouement to satisfy the reader’s curiosity. Like life itself, In the Lake of the Woods is a fascinating and also frustrating mystery without any type of absolute fact. O’Brien emphasizes that what human beings speak to “facts” and also “truth” are psychological constructions that deserve to never before be isolated from the perceiver’s allude of view; simply as the angle of light from the sunlight determines the shade of the Lake of the Woods, the author’s angle of vision forms the truth projected in a novel. As in his earlier functions, O’Brien purposely blurs the boundary in between reality and also fiction, arguing that the last have the right to be even more truthful than the former.
Toward the end of the novel, readers are told that every little thing that has actually been related is hypothesis. Several of the chapters in reality bear the title “Hypothesis.” In them, O’Brien dramatizes feasible scenes of Kathy’s disappearance—she gets lost in the Lake in the Woods, she is murdered by John, and also so forth. Other chapters are titled “Evidence.” The evidence in each contains testimony about John and Kathy by their household, friends, and acquaintances—testimony that is inconclusive and also regularly contradictory. Similarly, the material facts of the case cannot prove or disprove any of the hypotheses. The “Evidence” chapters, moreover, do not restrict themselves to the novel’s fictional people, for they contain quotations from Miguel de Cervantes, Fyodor Dostoevski, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Sigmund Freud, Harry Houdini, Ricdifficult Nixon, Woodrow Wilson, and a host of other novelists, historians, psychologists, and also famous personperiods. All the quotations are cited in footnotes, as if they were component of a academic book rather than a novel. Therefore the “evidence” reaches out right into the “real” world of history. Yet history, as the quotations and source notes signify, is itself textual, a verbal reconstruction of previous experience that is no longer immediately easily accessible. By embedding his novel in the intertextual web of various other narratives that comment on battle and battle crimes, evil, love, and also various other concepts that are at the core of In the Lake of the Woods, O’Brien paradoxically makes his fiction a component of background and of the “real” world.
The “Evidence” chapters additionally contain footnote comments by O’Brien himself, or rather by his persona, which discuss the writing of the novel and also expush opinions on the issues it raises. In his final self-reflexive footnote, O’Brien describes why he refprovides to settle the mystery he has created: “Nopoint is fixed, nothing is resolved. The facts, such as they are, lastly spin off into the void of points missing, the inconclusiveness of conclusion. Mystery lastly clintends us. Who are we? Where carry out we go?”
O’Brien’s refusal to administer a tidy finishing to his tale; his insistence that all reality is a mental building and construction and therefore never “universal”; his mixing of genres and also intentional blurring of the lines between reality and fiction; his self-reflexive footnotes—all these are common traits of the postmodernist novel, for example, E. L. Doctorow’s Ragtime (1975) or John Fowles’s The French Lieutenant’s Woman (1969). Readers unacquainted with or hostile toward postmodernism might therefore lose their bearings in In the Lake of the Woods.
Even those whose taste leans towards traditional realism will certainly be gripped by O’Brien’s brutally realistic descriptions of Vietnam, which are supplemented by the appalling testimony taken from transcripts of Lieutenant William Calley’s court-martial proceedings, and also from historic papers detailing inhumane acts in other battles. Any lover of fiction will appreciate the novel’s splendid dialogue, especially the dialogue that suggests even more than it clearly claims (in this regard, O’Brien rivals an additional teller of love-and-battle stories, Erswarm Hemingway). O’Brien additionally has a gift for startling imeras, such as that of two snakes swpermitting each other (the image is an allegory of John and Kathy’s self-devouring love for one another). Most readers will be captivated by the novel’s unflinching glimpses right into the dark side of huguy nature, a dark side that is often lugged into activity by feelings of love rather than hate. Ironically, this postmodernist novel, which questions the visibility of objective fact, appears practically unbearably true at times.
In the Lake of the Woods closes with the question of whether John Wade was a monster or merely a man. That question points to a problematic concern in the novel. On the one hand also, O’Brien emphasizes that Sorcerer obtained lost in the moral jungle long before he saw Vietnam; his obsessive need for love and his bent toward secrecy and also deceit stem from his connection via his alcoholic father and also from the father’s suicide. On the other hand also, if Sorcerer’s emotional difficulties are rooted in his specific childhood experiences, then why does O’Brien imply at various other points in the narrative that Sorcerer is the embodiment of a dark self that lurks within all huguy beings? The novel appears to be at odds through itself as to whether Wade is to be viewed as a number of abnormal psychology or as universal huguy nature.
See more: Why Are Water Storage Tanks Built On Towers Or Hilltops ? Water Tower
In 1994, O’Brien, who had patrolled the My Lai area the year after Calley’s firm committed the atrocities there, returned to Vietnam and also to My Lai itself. Writing around the expedition in The New York Times Magazine (October 2, 1994), O’Brien says that the Vietnam War was favor a lengthy horror film that would not end for him, and that he hoped his return to the site of his painful memories would “make the bad pictures go amethod.” In the Lake of the Woods, which took O’Brien six years to create, is an imaginative go back to the tragedy of Vietnam, via the very same objective as the physical trip: to make the bad images go amethod, to lastly put to remainder the ghosts that have actually haunted him, and his nation, because his rerevolve from that war. Whether the novel deserve to perform that magic feat have to remajor an enigma.