The "Weapons Effect"

Research reflects that the mere existence of tools might boost aggression.

Posted January 18, 2013 | Reviewed by Matt Huston

“Guns not only permit violence, they can stimulate it also. The finger pulls the trigger, however the cause might additionally be pulling the finger.”

—Leonard Berkowitz, Emeritus Professor of Psychology, College of Wisconsin

In 1967, Leonard Berkowitz and Anthony LePage carried out a fascinating examine.

You are watching: Research suggests that the sight of a weapon can

<1> First, participants were angered by a person pretending to be an additional participant (referred to as a confederate). Next off, participants were seated at a table that had actually a shotgun and also a revolver on it—or, in the manage condition, badminton racquets and also shuttlecocks. The items on the table were explained as component of one more experiment that the researcher had actually supposedly foracquired to put away. The participant was meant to decide what level of electrical shock to provide to the confederate that had angered them, and also the electrical shocks were provided to measure aggression. The experimenter told participants to disregard the items on the table, but supposedly they could not. Participants who witnessed the weapons were more aggressive than were participants who experienced the sporting activities items. This impact was called the “weapons impact.”

Research likewise shows that vehicle drivers through weapons in their cars more most likely to drive aggressively.<2> A nationally representative sample of over 2,000 Amerihave the right to vehicle drivers discovered that those who had a gun in the car were considerably more likely to make obscene gestures at various other motorists (23% vs. 16%), aggressively follow one more automobile as well very closely (14% vs. 8%), or both (6.3% vs. 2.8%), even after controlling for many type of various other components related to aggressive driving (e.g., sex, age, urbanization, census region, driving frequency). Recent study replicated this finding in a driving simulation experiment.<3>

Person beings have the right to determine potentially dangerous, threatening stimuli such as spiders and also snakes extremely easily. This makes feeling from an evolutionary perspective bereason some spiders and snakes are poisonous, and also our ancient ancestors that might identify them quickly were even more most likely to protect against them and also live to pass on their genes. Recent research study reflects that civilization have the right to recognize weapons as conveniently as they can determine spiders and also snakes.<4>,<5>,<6> These findings are extremely amazing bereason firearms are modern dangers so this cannot be defined as quickly utilizing evolutionary ethics. Yet guns are much even more dangerous to human being now than spiders or snakes. Poisonous spiders (e.g., Black Widows, Brown Recluses) kill about 6 Americans yearly.<7> Poisonous snakes (e.g., rattlesnakes) kill around five Americans every year.<8> In comparichild, firearms kill about 31,000 Americans annually.<9>

Several researches have replicated the tools impact. A testimonial of 56 publiburned studies reported that the mere sight of tools boosts aggression in both angry and nonangry people.<10> An even more recent meta-evaluation of a bigger sample of 151 effect-size estimates from 78 independent research studies entailing 7,668 participants found strong assistance for the concept that tools increase the availability of aggressive thoughts and hostile appraisals.<11> However before, more study is essential on the connect in between expocertain to tools and also aggression in provoked participants, particularly in field settings. A large (N = 678) recent area examine uncovered that the presence of a TASER considerably boosted physical strikes versus police policemans.<12> Perhaps the tools impact occurs bereason tools are carefully connected to aggression in our brains.Note. This blog short article is based on the complying with article: Bushman, B. J.(2013). The tools result. JAMA Pediatrics, 167(12), 1094-1095. DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.3824

<1> Berkowitz, L., & LePage, A. (1967). Weapons as aggression-eliciting stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 202–207.

<2> Hemenmeans, D., Vriniotis, M., & Miller, M. (2006). Is an equipped society a polite society? Guns and also road rage. Accident Analysis and also Prevention, 38(4), 687–695.

<3> Bushguy, B. J., Kerwin, T., Whitlock, T., & Weisenberger, J. M.(2017). The weapons effect on wheels: Motorists drive even more aggressively as soon as there is a gun in the car. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 82-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.007

<4> Blanchette, I. (2006). Snakes, spiders, guns, and also syringes: How particular are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(8), 1484–1504.

<5> Carlkid, J. M., Fee, A. L., & Reinke, K. S. (2009). Backward masked snakes and also guns modulate spatial attention. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(4), 534–544.

<6> Fox, E., Griggs, L., & Mouchlianitis, E. (2007). The detection of fear-pertinent stimuli: Are guns noticed as quickly as snakes? Eactivity, 7(4), 691–696.


<10> Carlson, M., Marcus-Newhall, A., & Miller, N. (1990). Effects of situational aggression cues: A quantitative evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 622–633.

More referrals

About the Author


Brad J. Bushmale, Ph.D.

See more: Why Does My Wifi Extender Keeps Losing Connection ? My Netgear Extender Keeps Disconnecting

, is a Professor of Communication and the Rinehart Chair of Mass Communication at The Ohio State College.