Red States vs. Blue States

The terms “red state” (Republican-voting) and “blue state” (Democratic-voting) were standardized in the time of the 2000 US presidential election.

You are watching: The concept of realignment refers to changes in


Key Takeaways

Key PointsDue to the fact that 2000, red says are claims that vote predominately Republideserve to during an election while blue claims are states that vote predominately Democratic in the time of an election.Prior to the 2000 presidential election, different media outlet employed divergent color schemes to screen states’ party choices.The confusion surrounding the outcome of the 2000 presidential election produced conformity about the present knowledge of red and blue says even though there was no coordinated media initiative to standardize the colors and neither party’s national committee has actually formally endorsed either color.The red state-blue state designation has been criticized for not accurately predicting the outcomes of all elections, for ignoring closely separated says, and for not representing the outcomes of state and neighborhood elections accurately.Key Termsblue state: A state of the USA voting Democratic in a provided election, or tfinishing to vote Democratic in general.red state: A state of the United States voting Republihave the right to in a provided election, or tfinishing to vote Republideserve to in basic.electdental college: A body of electors empowered to elect someone to a certain office

During the 2000 US presidential election, the term “red states” was coined to suppose those says whose inhabitants primarily vote for the Republideserve to Party and “blue states” as those says whose inhabitants mainly vote for the Democratic Party. The terms have been broadened because 2000 to distinguish between conservative-leaning claims, depicted in red, and liberal-leaning claims, depicted in blue.


*

Red States and Blue States: News media generally display screen maps in blue, red, and also purple to show mainly Democratic-voting claims, Republican-voting states, and middle ground states.


The association of says via colors to suggest their party voting choices was not a new phenomenon prior to the 2000 presidential election. In fact, the advent of shade television motivated many kind of tv news reporters to depict state voting preferences through color-coded electoral maps. The 2000 presidential election, but, was the first time that red ended up being the standardized color for the Republihave the right to Party and blue came to be the standardized shade for the Democratic Party. Previously, color schemes differed across networks. For circumstances, in the 1980 presidential election NBC provided blue for predominately Democratic-voting says and red for predominately Republican-voting says while ABC employed the opposite color scheme. Other netfunctions alternated red and also blue in between the Democratic and Republihave the right to Parties every 4 years.

The 2000 presidential election proved significant in standardizing red and blue claims via the Republican and Democratic Parties, respectively, bereason of the confusion bordering the outcomes of the election. Major media outallows began conforming to the same color plan bereason the electdental map was continually in watch and conformity developed basic viewer comprehension. The association of blue via Democrats and also red via Republicans is currently component of the lexsymbol of Amerideserve to journalism and also has informally been supplied by each party. Interestingly, though, tbelow was no coordinated media initiative to designate Democratic says blue and also Republican claims red on the 2000 election night and also neither party’s national committee has actually officially welcomed the red and blue shade desigcountries.

Regardless of the nearly nationwide acceptance of Republihave the right to red says and also Democratic blue says, the paradigm has come under criticism. Some argue that assigning partisanship to says is only valuable in expertise voting choices in the Electdental College. The Republideserve to and also Democratic Parties within a offered state might have platdevelops that decomponent from national party platdevelops. Such a instance deserve to lead a state to favor one party in state and also local elections and one more party in presidential elections. The designation of says as either being red or blue also ignores those claims that are very closely divided in between Democratic and also Republican candidays. Anvarious other criticism of the red state-blue state paradigm is that it has actually not been completely predictive of how says will certainly vote. For instance, in the 2008 presidential election Democratic candiday Barack Obama caught the majority vote in many kind of red claims that had not voted Democratic in many type of years, such as North Carolina, Indiana, and also Virginia.


Party Realignments, Dealignments, and Tipping

Realignment describes national elections in which tright here are sharp changes in worries that create brand-new structures that lasts for years.


Key Takeaways

Key PointsRealignment implies the coming to power for several years of a brand-new coalition, replacing an old dominant coalition of the various other party.Political realignments deserve to be sudden (1–4 years) or can take location more progressively (5–20 years).The central holding of realignment theory, first emerged in the political scientist V. O. Key, Jr.’s 1955 post, “A Theory of Critical Elections,” is that Amerihave the right to elections, parties and policymaking on a regular basis change in swift, dramatic sweeps.Dealignment is a trend or process whereby a huge portion of the electoprice abandons its previous partisan affiliation, without emerging a new one to relocation it.Many scholars argue that the fads in elections in the United States over the last several years are finest identified as dealignment.A tipping suggest is a suggest in time as soon as a team —or a huge number of team members— rapidly and substantially transforms its behavior by commonly adopting a formerly rare exercise.Key TermsRealignment: Realignment means the coming to power for numerous years of a new coalition, replacing an old dominant coalition of the various other party.Dealignment: Dealignment is a trend or procedure whereby a big percentage of the electoprice abandons its previous partisan affiliation, without emerging a new one to rearea it.Tipping point: A tipping allude is a allude in time as soon as a team —or a big variety of team members— quickly and drastically changes its habits by widely adopting a previously rare exercise.

Introduction

Realigning election are terms from political science and also political background describing a dramatic readjust in the political mechanism. Scholars typically apply the term to American elections and occasionally to other countries. Typically it means the coming to power for several years of a new coalition, replacing an old leading coalition of the other party as in 1896 once the GOP ended up being dominant, or 1932 when the Democrats ended up being leading. More especially, it refers to American nationwide elections in which there are sharp alters in issues, party leaders, the local and also demographic bases of power of the 2 parties, and also structure or rules of the political device (such as voter eligibility or financing), resulting in a brand-new political power framework that lasts for decades.

Political realignments can be sudden (1–4 years) or deserve to take place more gradually (5–20 years). Political researchers and historians often disagree around which elections are realignments and also what defines a realignment, and even whether realignments happen. The terms themselves are rather arbitrary, but, and usage among political scientists and also historians does vary.

Realignment

The main holding of realignment concept, initially occurred in the political scientist V. O. Key, Jr.’s 1955 post, “A Theory of Critical Elections,” is that American elections, parties and also policymaking routinely change in swift, dramatic sweeps. V. O. Key Jr. concluded that organized trends are identifiable in Amerihave the right to nationwide elections such that cycles happen on a continuous schedule: once eextremely 36-years or so. This duration of about 30 years fits through the concept that these cycles are carefully linked to generational readjust. For social researchers, this allude is crucial, considering that it helps to administer an objective sociological basis for the concept. Tipping describes the end of an age and the crystallization of another.

A good instance of realignment came at the end of George W. Bush’s presidency. In the 2008 elections, the Democrats expanded their majorities in the Congress, and also won the Presidency decisively. This was because of the momentum carried over from the Democrats’ 2006 successes, and the continued unpopularity of President George W. Bush, whose administration was now confronted with a financial crisis and also financial recession. Some world think that 2008 is perhaps a realigning election with a long-lasting influence, just as the election of Franklin D. Roosevelt remained in 1932 and the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980 were. President Obama was rechosen in the 2012 election too, coming to be only the 3rd Democrat to win a majority of the famous vote more than once while losing only 2 says that he had won in 2008.

Dealignment

A central component of realignment is the readjust in behavior of voting teams. Realignment indicates the switching of voter preference from one party to an additional, in contrast to dealignment ­ wbelow a voter team abandons a party to become independent or nonvoting. Dealignment, in brief, is a trfinish or procedure whereby a large percent of the electoprice abandons its previous partisan affiliation, without emerging a new one to rearea it.

In addition, dealignment refers to a decline by voters to their political party; that is a decrease in party loyalty and voters be less attached to their party. This dealignment shows that short term factors can play a larger role than usual in whether a candidate receives a vote from someamong his party. Several factors deserve to be attributed to partisan dealignment, such as a better political awareness and also socialisation, extensive electronic media coverage and also decrease of deference; disillusionment both through parties and also political leaders, and the majority of importantly, the bad performance of federal government. Many scholars argue that the patterns in elections in the USA over the last numerous decades are ideal identified as dealignment.

Tipping

Tipping refers to the finish of a period and the crystallization of another. More especially, tipping suggest is a point in time when a group —or a big number of group members— quickly and also significantly changes its habits by commonly adopting a previously rare practice. The phrase was initially supplied in sociology by Morton Grodzins as soon as he adopted the phrase from physics wbelow it referred to the adding a little amount of weight to a well balanced object until the added weight led to the object to unexpectedly and completely topple, or tip. Grodzins studied integrating Amerihave the right to communities in the early on 1960s. He uncovered that a lot of of the white families continued to be in the neighborhood as lengthy as the comparative number of babsence families continued to be incredibly tiny. But, at a particular allude, as soon as “one as well many” babsence families arrived, the staying white households would move out en masse in a process recognized as white trip. He referred to as that moment the “tipping point”.


Obama Campaign 2008: Some people believe that 2008 is perhaps a realigning election with a long-lasting impact, simply as the election of Franklin D. Roosevelt was in 1932 and also the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980 were. President Obama was reelected in the 2012 election also, coming to be just the 3rd Democrat to win a bulk of the famous vote even more than as soon as while shedding only 2 claims that he had won in 2008.


Key Takeaways

Key PointsAn Independent or nonpartisan politician is an individual not affiliated to any political party. Independents may organize a centrist viewallude in between those of significant political parties.Historically, George Washington was the only president chosen as an Independent, as he was not formally affiliated via any kind of party during his two terms.Tbelow have actually been several Independents elected to the USA Senate throughout history. Examples encompass David Davis of Illinois (a previous Republican ) in the nineteenth century, and Harry F. Byrd, Jr. of Virginia (who had been chosen to his initially term as a Democrat) in the 20th century.In August 2008, tbelow were 12 people who organized offices as Independents in state legislatures. Tright here were four state senators, one from Kentucky, one from Oregon, one from Tennescheck out, and one from New Mexico.Key Termsindependent: A candiday or voter not affiliated through any political party, a complimentary thinker, complimentary of a party platdevelop.Whig Party: It is a party that was common in the Jacksonian age of democracy.
*

George Washington: First President of the United States


In national politics, an independent or nonpartisan politician is an individual not affiliated to any kind of political party. Independents may hold a centrist viewallude between those of significant political parties. Sometimes, they hold a viewpoint even more extreme than any significant party, or they may have a viewpoint based on worries that they do not feel that any type of major party addresses. Other Independent political leaders might be associated through a political party, were former members of it, or have views that align via it however choose not to stand also under its label.

Historically, George Washington was the only president elected as an Independent, as he was not formally affiliated with any kind of party during his two terms. John Tyler was expelled from the Whig Party in September 1841 and continued to be effectively an Independent for the remainder of his presidency, later on returning to the Democrats. He briefly sought re- election in 1844 as a National Democrat, yet he withdrew, as he feared to break-up the Democratic vote. Recent significant Independent candidays for president of the United States include John Anderchild in 1980, Ross Perot in 1992, and Ralph Nader in the 2004 and also 2008 elections. In 2008, Independent Presidential candidate, Ralph Nader created Independent parties in New Mexico, Delconscious, and also in other places to gain ballot accessibility in several states. This strategy has actually been sought by a number of Independent candidays for Federal races, including Joe Lieberguy (Connecticut for Lieberman), because in some claims it is easier to get ballot accessibility by producing a new political party than to gather signatures for a nominating petition.

Independents in Congress

Tbelow have been several Independents chosen to the USA Senate throughout history. Notable examples include David Davis of Illinois (a former Republican) in the nineteenth century, and Harry F. Byrd, Jr. of Virginia (who had actually been elected to his initially term as a Democrat) in the twentieth century. Some officials have been elected as members of a party yet ended up being an Independent while in office (without being elected as such), such as Wayne Morse of Oregon or Virgil Goode of Virginia. Nebraska senator George W. Norris was chosen for four terms as a Republideserve to prior to transforming to an Independent after the Republicans lost their majority in Congress in 1930. Norris won re-election as an Independent in 1936, yet later shed his last re-election attempt to Republican Kenneth S. Wherry in 1942. Vermont senator Jim Jeffords left the Republihave the right to Party to come to be an Independent in 2001.

Independents in State and Local Offices

In August 2008, there were 12 people who organized offices as Independents in state legislatures. Tright here were 4 state senators, one from Kentucky, one from Oregon, one from Tenneswatch, and one from New Mexico. The representatives came from the states of Louisiana (two), Maine (two), Vermont (two), and also Virginia (two). In the 2008 basic elections, Wisconsin State Assemblyman Jeffrey Wood left the Republican Party and also won reelection as an Independent. After the 2008 major election, New Mexico State Senator Joseph Carraro left the Republican Party and registered as an Independent. He did not run for reelection.

See more: Why Do We Close Our Eyes When We Pray ? Why Do We Close Our Eyes During Prayer

In November 2005, Manny Diaz was chosen Mayor of Miami, Florida as an Independent. On June 19, 2007, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg switched his party affiliation from Republican to Independent. Osauto Goodmale, Mayor of Las Vegas, Nevada switched his affiliation to Independent from Democrat in December 2009.