In Episode 5 of Seakid 6 of the TV display Parks and Recreation, Ron Swanboy (played by actor Nick Offerman) confirmed his Last Will and Testament to Ben Wyatt (played by actor Adam Scott). Ben asked Ron if he would be a witness to his Will and also Ron responded by reflecting him his very own Will which he wrote at age eight and also keeps in his wallet:

RonI’ve had the same Will since I was eight years old. (hands Ben his Will)Ben: (analysis Ron’s Will) Upon my death every one of my belongings shall carry to the man or animal who has killed me. BenWhat are these weird symbols?RonThe man who kills me will certainly know.

You are watching: The man who kills me will know

Below is an evaluation of Ron’s Will under the regulations of Oregon, also though he likely signed it in the state of Indiana. (this is a fun exercise, so let’s suspend truth, if any exists at all).

Would Ron Swanson’s Will be legally known in the State of Oregon?

Ron Swanchild wrote his Will by hand, in ink, in its whole. No witnesses signed his Will. A pucount handcreated Will signed by the testator with no witnesses current is described as a holographic Will. Ron’s holographic Will likewise has signs in a language various other than English.

Oregon recognizes handwritten Wills, yet not holographic Wills unless the Will was validly executed in one more state.

Huh?! That certainly is a confmaking use of statement so let’s break it down:

Oregon allows for handcomposed Wills so lengthy as it was signed in front of 2 witnesses, and those 2 witnesses authorize the Will also. (ORS 112.235) A holographic Will is a handwritten Will that lacks the signatures of 2 witnesses. Due to the fact that Ron’s Will lacks the signatures of 2 witnesses, it is not valid if executed in the State of Oregon.

However before, tbelow might be a conserving grace. According to ORS 112.255, in Oregon a Will that has actually been correctly executed in a different state is still valid, consisting of holographic Wills, so long as the various other state enables for holographic Wills. Ron did not execute the Will while he was living in Oregon! (He thrived up in the State of Indiana where, at the age of nine, he acquired a job at a sheet metal factory). So, it is very likely Ron executed his Will in Indiana. If Indiana enables for holographic Wills his Will would be recognized as legally valid in the State of Oregon.

Sadly, it appears that Indiana does not accept holographic Wills.

Was Ron Swanson as well young to have actually a Will?

Ron got his initially job at age nine, and at age eleven, was working 2 jobs. He was a man ahead of his time, both figuratively and also otherwise.

In spite of that, he was still also young to execute a Will.

Ron composed and also signed his Will when he was eight years old. In Oregon, a perchild can execute a Will just when they are eighteenager years old, or older. (ORS 112.225)

In Oregon, slayers don’t win…

Yes, but let’s say that for argument’s sake, Ron Swanson’s Will is valid. Can we all have actually a Will that is as simple as his? Isn’t his Will artistic and ultimately legally effective?

Many kind of states, including Oregon, have enacted laws to encertain that a killer does not advantage from the death of their victim. These laws are often referred to as slayer statutes. In Oregon, the statutes are found in Chapter 112 of the Oregon Revised Statutes ranging from ORS 112.455 to 112.555. When the homicide is a felony, conclusively figured out by the last judgment of a criminal conviction, Oregon’s slayer statute uses. (ORS 112.555) What that means is Ron’s killer can not legally get every one of his belongings as his Will dictates.

…. unless the slayer is an animal

Ron’s Will could still have legal result if an pet, not a huguy, killed him. A “slayer” is identified as “a perboy who, via felonious intent, takes or procures the taking of the life of a decedent.” (ORS 112.455(3)). An animal is not a perboy, therefore, the animal would not be barred from taking Ron’s assets upon his death also if the animal brought about his death.

See more: Why You Should Always Do What You Are Afraid To Do What You'Re Afraid To Do

But pets are not world so they cannot inherit residential or commercial property, right?!

Not in Oregon… pets deserve to benefit from the assets of someone that has actually died. In the State of Oregon, a trust have the right to be developed in a Will (or one more Trust) to provide for the treatment of one or even more pets. (ORS 130.185)

Even though Ron’s Will does not particularly cite the word “trust”, a probate court may produce a Constructive Trust to host the assets for the advantage of the animal that took Ron’s life. A court creates a constructive trust whenever before a perchild (or animal) that need to not be permitted to retain building holds title to home. In this situation, a judge presiding over the probate of Ron’s Will can create a constructive trust to host and also carry out his belongings for the benefit of the pet that eliminated him.