I normally obtain this right, but for some reason this specific phrase is giving me headaches. The phrase in question is:

"Not that there were an abundance of sticks or building supplies"

Ordinarily, as the sticks/structure offers are plural I"d assume were; however, as I consider "an abundance" to be a singular object encompassing multiple various other objects, it gives me pausage. Should it be "was a wealth of sticks or building supplies"?

Which is more correct?

Edit: my English teacher uncle just called, quite fortuitously, and advised that I was correct in my original assertion that it should be was an abundance. He additionally reminded me that "a multitude" adheres to the same rules (which I knew, and had actually entirely forgotten).

You are watching: There is an abundance or there are an abundance

Improve this question
asked Sep 24 "18 at 7:32
'Was an abundance' feels ideal to me.
–Kate Bunting
Sep 24 "18 at 8:02
Add a comment |

2 Answers 2

Active Oldest Votes
I"m suspecting this is a instance of the virtually non-existent usage of the subjunctive mood/tense in English, mostly present when making use of the verb "to be". If the use is hypothetical, one nearly always supplies the subjunctive, as in "if I were you." In this case it"s not rather clear and also both, I think, might be used relying on the intent. The use in the example right here is more a definite statement of truth than hypothesis and also I"d feel even more comfortable making use of "was".

Improve this answer
answered Sep 24 "18 at 18:10
Dan S.Dan S.
Add a comment |
Not that tright here was a wealth of sticks or structure supplies.

The over sentence is correct bereason of sticks or structure supplies is just some extra indevelopment around the abundance you intended, i.e., it answers Abundance of what?.

If only tright here was and rather of or in your sentence both were and was would certainly be correct conveying various meaning.

Not that tright here were an abundance of sticks and also building supplies.Not that tbelow was an abundance of sticks and building supplies.
Improve this answer
answered Sep 24 "18 at 17:39

Zeeshan AliZeeshan Ali
1,74822 gold badges1010 silver badges3333 bronze badges
Add a comment |

Your Answer

Thanks for contributing a solution to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid

Asking for aid, clarification, or responding to other answers.Making statements based upon opinion; back them up through referrals or personal endure.

To learn even more, view our tips on writing great answers.

See more: The Process Of Sending And Receiving Messages Is Called, The Process Of Sending And Receiving Messages

Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google
Sign up making use of Facebook
Sign up using Email and also Password

Message as a guest

Email Required, yet never shown

Post as a guest


Required, yet never shown

Post Your Answer Discard

By clicking “Blog post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy plan and cookie policy

Featured on Meta
Should I usage was or were?
"Who was" or "Who were"?
Was vs Were - subjective or not?
How were or How was?
"There was time" or "Tright here were time"?
"were studied" or " was Studied"
Was or were? Which one is correct?
Hot Netjob-related Questions even more warm concerns

Concern feed
Subscribe to RSS
Question feed To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader.


English Language Learners
Company kind of
Stack Exchange Netjob-related
site architecture / logo © 2021 Stack Exadjust Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. rev2021.9.2.40142

English Language Learners Stack Exreadjust works ideal through JavaScript enabled

Your privacy

By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exadjust can keep cookies on your gadget and also discshed information in accordance with our Cookie Policy.