In Chapter 2 “How Is Job Costing Used to Track Production Costs?”, we debated exactly how to report production costs and nonproduction prices adhering to U.S. Typically Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP). Under UNITED STATE GAAP, all nonproduction costs (offering and bureaucratic costs) are treated as duration expenses bereason they are expensed on the income statement in the duration in which they are incurred. All prices connected via manufacturing are treated as product prices, including straight products, direct labor, and addressed and variable production overhead. These costs are attached to inventory as an asset on the balance sheet until the goods are offered, at which suggest the prices are moved to expense of goods offered on the income statement as an price. This strategy of accountancy is referred to as absorption costing because all production overhead costs (solved and also variable) are absorbed into inventory until the items are sold. (The term complete costing is also offered to explain absorption costing.)

Question: Although absorption costing is offered for outside reporting, supervisors often prefer to usage an alternate costing technique for interior reporting functions dubbed variable costing. What is variable costing, and also exactly how does it compare to absorption costing?

Answer: Variable costing calls for that all variable manufacturing prices be had in inventory, and all fixed manufacturing prices (resolved manufacturing overhead) be reported as duration prices. Therefore all fixed manufacturing costs are expensed as incurred.

You are watching: When the number of units produced equals the number of units sold

The just difference in between absorption costing and also variable costing is in the treatment of fixed manufacturing overhead. Using absorption costing, solved manufacturing overhead is reported as a product cost. Using variable costing, fixed manufacturing overhead is reported as a period cost. Figure 6.8 “Absorption Costing Versus Variable Costing” summarizes the similarities and also distinctions in between absorption costing and variable costing.


Figure 6.8 Absorption Costing Versus Variable Costing


Impact of Absorption Costing and also Variable Costing on Profit

Question: If a company provides just-in-time inventory, and also therefore has no beginning or finishing inventory, profit will certainly be exactly the same regardless of the costing method provided. However before, many suppliers have systems of product in inventory at the finish of the reporting period. How does the use of absorption costing impact the worth of ending inventory?

Answer: Since absorption costing has fixed production overhead as a product cost, all assets that reprimary in finishing inventory (i.e., are unoffered at the end of the period) incorporate a section of solved manufacturing overhead costs as an asset on the balance sheet. Due to the fact that variable costing treats solved manufacturing overhead costs as period prices, all addressed production overhead prices are expensed on the income statement when incurred. Therefore if the amount of devices produced exceeds the quantity of systems offered, absorption costing will lead to greater profit.

We highlight this concept with an example. The adhering to indevelopment is for Bullard Company, a producer of clock radios:



Assume Bullard has actually no finiburned items inventory at the start of month 1. We will certainly look at absorption costing versus variable costing for 3 various scenarios:

Month 1 scenario: 10,000 devices produced equals 10,000 systems soldMonth 2 scenario: 10,000 devices developed is better than 9,000 devices soldMonth 3 scenario: 10,000 devices created is less than 11,000 systems sold

Month 1: Number of Units Produced Equals Number of Units Sold

Question: During month 1, Bullard Company kind of sells all 10,000 devices developed in the time of the month. How does operating profit compare utilizing absorption costing and also variable costing once the variety of units created equals the variety of devices sold?

Answer: Figure 6.9 “Number of Units Produced Equals Number of Units Sold” presents the outcomes for each costing method. Notice that the absorption costing income statement is referred to as a traditional revenue statement, and the variable costing revenue statement is called a contribution margin revenue statement.

As you evaluation Figure 6.9 “Number of Units Produced Equals Number of Units Sold”, notification that once the number of systems developed amounts to the number sold, profit totaling $90,000 is similar for both costing approaches. With absorption costing, addressed production overhead costs are completely expensed bereason all systems created are sold (tbelow is no ending inventory). With variable costing, resolved production overhead prices are treated as duration prices and also therefore are constantly expensed in the period incurred. Due to the fact that all other prices are treated the exact same regardless of the costing approach used, profit is the same when the number of devices developed and sold is the very same.


Figure 6.9 Number of Units Produced Equals Number of Units Sold

a $250,000 = $25 × 10,000 systems marketed.

b $110,000 = ($4 per unit addressed manufacturing cost × 10,000 systems sold) + ($7 per unit variable manufacturing expense × 10,000 units sold).

c $70,000 = $7 per unit variable production cost × 10,000 devices offered.

d $50,000 = $20,000 fixed marketing and also admin. expense + ($3 per unit variable selling and also admin. price × 10,000 devices sold).

e $30,000 = $3 per unit variable selling and admin. cost × 10,000 systems marketed.

f Variable costing treats solved manufacturing overhead as a duration expense. Therefore all addressed production overhead prices are expensed in the period incurred regardless of the level of sales.

g Given.


Month 2: Number of Units Produced Is Greater Than Number of Units Sold

Question: Throughout month 2, Bullard Company kind of produces 10,000 systems but sells only 9,000 units. How does operating profit compare making use of absorption costing and variable costing when the number of devices developed is higher than the number of systems sold?

Answer: Figure 6.10 “Number of Units Produced Is Greater Than Number of Units Sold” presents the outcomes for each costing strategy. Notice that absorption costing results in higher profit. When absorption costing is used, a portion of solved production overhead expenses continues to be in finishing inventory as an asset on the balance sheet until the items are sold. However, variable costing needs that all fixed production overhead expenses be expensed as incurred regardless of the level of sales. Thus once more units are produced than are offered, variable costing outcomes in higher prices and lower profit.

The distinction in profit in between the two approaches of $4,000 (= $79,000 − $75,000) is attributed to the $4 per unit solved production overhead expense assigned to the 1,000 systems in finishing inventory utilizing absorption costing ($4,000 = $4 × 1,000 units).


Figure 6.10 Number of Units Produced Is Greater Than Number of Units Sold

a $225,000 = $25 × 9,000 devices marketed.

b $99,000 = ($4 per unit fixed production expense × 9,000 devices sold) + ($7 per unit variable manufacturing cost × 9,000 devices sold).

c $63,000 = $7 per unit variable production price × 9,000 units sold.

d $47,000 = $20,000 addressed offering and also admin. price + ($3 per unit variable selling and admin. price × 9,000 units sold).

e $27,000 = $3 per unit variable marketing and admin. expense × 9,000 units offered.

f Variable costing constantly treats fixed manufacturing overhead as a duration expense. Therefore all resolved manufacturing overhead expenses are expensed in the period incurred regardmuch less of the level of sales.

g Given.


Month 3: Number of Units Produced Is Less Than Number of Units Sold

Question: Throughout month 3, Bullard Company type of produces 10,000 devices however sells 11,000 devices (1,000 systems were left over from month 2 and therefore were in inventory at the start of month 3). How does operating profit compare using absorption costing and also variable costing when the number of units produced is much less than the variety of units sold?

Answer: Figure 6.11 “Number of Units Produced Is Less Than Number of Units Sold” presents the outcomes for each costing approach. Using variable costing, the $40,000 in fixed production overhead expenses continues to be expensed when incurred. However, using absorption costing, the whole $40,000 is expensed bereason all 10,000 devices developed were sold; a secondary $4,000 pertained to the 1,000 systems produced last month and also pulled from inventory this month is also expensed. Thus once fewer units are produced than are sold, absorption costing outcomes in better expenses and also lower profit.

The difference in profit in between the two methods of $4,000 (= $105,000 − $101,000) is attributed to the $4 per unit solved production overhead price assigned to the 1,000 systems in inventory on the balance sheet at the end of month 2 and recorded as expense of items sold during month 3 making use of absorption costing ($4,000 = $4 × 1,000 units).


Figure 6.11 Number of Units Produced Is Less Than Number of Units Sold

a $275,000 = $25 × 11,000 systems offered.

b $121,000 = ($4 per unit solved manufacturing expense × 11,000 units sold) + ($7 per unit variable production price × 11,000 units sold).

c $77,000 = $7 per unit variable manufacturing expense × 11,000 systems marketed.

d $53,000 = $20,000 fixed offering and also admin. cost + ($3 per unit variable marketing and also admin. cost × 11,000 systems sold).

e $33,000 = $3 per unit variable selling and also admin. price × 11,000 devices marketed.

f Variable costing constantly treats solved manufacturing overhead as a period expense. Thus all solved manufacturing overhead prices are expensed in the period incurred regardless of the level of sales.

g Given.


Advantages of Using Variable Costing

Question: Why carry out institutions use variable costing?

Answer: Variable costing provides managers with the information necessary to prepare a contribution margin income statement, which leads to more reliable cost-volume-profit (CVP) evaluation. By separating variable and resolved expenses, supervisors are able to identify contribution margin ratios, break-even points, and also taracquire profit points, and to perdevelop sensitivity analysis. Conversely, absorption costing meets the needs of UNITED STATE GAAP, but is not as useful for inner decision-making objectives.

Another benefit of using variable costing internally is that it prevents managers from enhancing production exclusively for the objective of inflating profit. For instance, assume the manager at Bullard Company kind of will get a bonus for getting to a details profit targain but expects to be $15,000 brief of the tarobtain. The firm supplies absorption costing, and also the manager realizes enhancing production (and therefore increasing inventory levels) will rise profit. The manager decides to produce 20,000 systems in month 4, even though just 10,000 units will certainly be sold. Half of the $40,000 in addressed manufacturing price ($20,000) will be had in inventory at the end of the period, thereby lowering costs on the earnings statement and increasing profit by $20,000. At some point, this will certainly capture approximately the manager because the firm will have excess or obsolete inventory in future months. However before, in the short run, the manager will certainly rise profit by enhancing manufacturing. This strategy does not work-related with variable costing because all fixed production overhead expenses are expensed as incurred, regardless of the level of sales.


Key Takeaway

As presented in Figure 6.8 “Absorption Costing Versus Variable Costing”, the just distinction between absorption costing and variable costing is in the treatment of fixed manufacturing overhead expenses. Absorption costing treats fixed production overhead as a product expense (consisted of in inventory on the balance sheet until sold), while variable costing treats fixed production overhead as a period expense (expensed on the earnings statement as incurred).When comparing absorption costing through variable costing, the complying with three rules apply: (1) When systems created amounts to units sold, profit is the exact same for both costing viewpoints. (2) When devices developed is better than systems offered, absorption costing yields the highest possible profit. (3) When systems created is much less than systems sold, variable costing returns the greatest profit.

See more: The Head And The Heart Richmond Va, The Head And The Heart


Resee Problem 6.8

Winter Sports, Inc., produces snowboards. The company has no finished items inventory at the start of year 1. The complying with indevelopment comes to Winter Sports, Inc.,:



All 100,000 units produced throughout year 1 are marketed in the time of year 1.Prepare a typical revenue statement assuming the agency provides absorption costing.Prepare a contribution margin income statement assuming the company uses variable costing.Although 100,000 devices are created in the time of year 2, only 80,000 are sold in the time of the year. The staying 20,000 systems are in finiburned items inventory at the finish of year 2.Prepare a standard income statement assuming the agency provides absorption costing.Prepare a contribution margin income statement assuming the firm supplies variable costing.

Systems to Review Problem 6.8